Memorandum For: | Tom Azumbrado, San Francisco Hub Director, 9AHMLAP |
Copy To: |
Harriet Tregoning, Director, Office of Economic Resilience
Helen Kanovsky, General Counsel, Office of General Counsel, DOR |
From: | Benjamin T. Metcalf, Deputy Assistant Secretary, For Multifamily Housing Programs, HT |
Subject: | Administrative Guidance for Multifamily Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) in California |
PACE-enabling legislation has been passed in 31 states. PACE is a means of financing energy efficiency upgrades or renewable energy installation in a building and the concept has been in use in California since 2001.
Consistent with the President's Climate Action Plan, the Department has entered into initiatives such as streamlining the utility analyses process, promoting the Better Buildings Challenge, and increasing minimum construction standards to comply with federal legislation. The Department's Office of Multifamily Housing Programs, Office of Housing, is constantly exploring additional ways to make the Multifamily portfolio more energy and water efficient, to reduce owner's and agent's operating costs and reduce HUD outlays for utilities, and has been identifying alternative sources of capital investment as part of such effort. PACE may be a viable way to achieve such efficiencies, however a mortgagor must receive written consent from its mortgagee and HUD to enter into a PACE assessment.
PACE assessments allow property owners to avoid the upfront costs of energy saving installations by entering into an assessment contract with the participating PACE locality, which stipulates that the property owner will repay the cost of improvements through a property tax assessment, typically over 20 years with semi-annual payments. PACE is premised on an analysis that demonstrates that the cost of the energy and water improvements will be paid in full on a one-to-one basis over time by the savings generated from the improvements. The funding is provided by local government funding or private capital channeled through a bond issuance. This memo recognizes the potential benefits of PACE for the multifamily portfolio and includes clarifying information regarding the processes under which HUD insured and assisted properties located in California may receive support for energy and water efficiency improvements by entering into PACE agreements.
California passed the first legislation for PACE financing in 2008. PACE financing programs for rooftop solar, and more broadly the financing of any eligible renewable technology, energy efficiency, or water efficiency investment, can be set up and administered under either of two different California statutory frameworks: the Improvement Act of 191l(lmprovement Act) as amended by AB 811 or the Mello-Roos Act under a city's charter authority or as amended under SB 555. Both the Improvement Act and Mello-Roos Act authorize creation of special tax districts, contractual agreements for financing between an authorized entity and the property owner, use of available funding from any source including existing bond issuing statutes, and attachment of the assessment to the property (as opposed to the individual owner) for repayment. Additionally, several programs were created by charter cities under their Mello-Roos Act authority before the passage of SB 555.
PACE was originally implemented in Berkeley, California as a means to help achieve the Bay Area's climate goals for homeowners. California's program allows multifamily property owners to finance energy saving equipment such as insulation, lighting, HVAC systems, onsite renewable energy (wind turbines, fuel cells, etc.) and water-saving upgrades such as low-flow plumbing fixtures and grey water systems. After an audit identifies the energy and water saving opportunities, the property owner enters into an assessment contract with the financing agency. The contract requires reimbursement of the cost of improvements through an annual property tax assessment lasting up to 20 years. The PACE obligation remains with the property through sale or transfer.
So far, local jurisdictions, within the State of California participate in the PACE program through multiple entities which can be found at http://www.pacenow.org/resources/all-programs/. Additionally, Los Angeles County, the City and County of San Francisco, and the City of Sacramento have PACE programs.
The FHA insurance programs are governed by the National Housing Act and the Act requires that the FHA insured mortgage be in first lien position as such first liens are commonly given under the laws of the State in which the real estate is located . . .". HUD's Office of General Counsel has received confirmation from the California Attorney General as to the nature and impact of the PACE special assessment; specifically that under California law, PACE assessments are treated in the same manner as property taxes and other assessments and delinquencies must be paid before any mortgage. While this impacts an FHA loan, PACE assessments are compatible with the Act because the FHA mortgage remains a first lien as is commonly given in California. Multifamily property owners will need approval from their lenders and the Department, however, to consent to a PACE program assessment because such participation will result in an increased, or additional, tax assessment, with corresponding ongoing obligations against the property and such approval is required under the owner's mortgage loan documents. Once HUD staff is made aware of an owner's desire to enter into a PACE program, the contents of this memorandum should be reviewed to ensure compliance with the Department's guidance for the minimum conditions under which the Department will approve a PACE assessment.
Owners shall not enter into a PACE assessment without the Department's consent. The Department will consider granting such consent to owners of projects participating in one of the programs enumerated above under the following minimum required conditions (PACE Approval Conditions):
In addition to the submission of documents that evidence the satisfaction of the PACE Approval Conditions, the Owner must provide i) copies of all PACE assessment documents submitted on its behalf to, and those received from, the locality/PACE administrator, and ii) either an opinion of its counsel or a satisfactory letter from or on behalf of the locality/PACE administrator, which confirms the following operational elements of the PACE program (Assessment Procedures):
After the owner of a property has received preliminary PACE approval from the locality, they should contact their lender and provide the lender with all of the above referenced submissions. The lender is responsible for reviewing the PACE Program and assessment documents, all other submissions, any related property improvements, and the impact on income and expenses. After review of the documents, improvements, and expenses, the lender should respond to the owner with their conditional approval, which will remain contingent upon HUD review and approval. Owners and lenders should be cautioned to not enter into any agreements without prior HUD review and approval. Owners will then forward their request to their HUD Project Manager/Account Executive for review.
For projects where HUD is the lender, or 202/81 l s, or where there is only rental assistance, the owner's request will be sent directly to their HUD Project Manager/Account Executive. The review should take no longer than 60 days.
Submission Requirements:
For HUD's consideration of the owner's request, the owner should provide HUD with the following documents:
Review Process:
The Project Manager/Account Executive will complete the following steps: (1) perform a completeness check to ensure that all required submission requirements are in the package, including conditional lender consent and an all unexecuted PACE agreements. (2) The opinion of owner's counsel or letter from or on behalf of the locality/PACE administrator on the Assessment Procedures should be sent to field counsel for a sufficiency review. (3)The Project Manager/ Account Executive will review the package to ensure that the project is in compliance with the approval conditions noted above. (4) The assistance of an appraiser may be needed to review an appraisal or other submitted valuation information. After determining that all conditions are met and OGC determines that the Assessment Procedures have been satisfactorily addressed, (5) an approval letter should be issued to the owner under the signature of the Hub Director.
Substantial Rehabilitation/Refinance Underwriting:
As stated above, it is anticipated that the PACE program will be largely applicable to multifamily properties with existing FHA-insured loans. However, in the event that an owner seeks a substantial rehabilitation or refinance using FHA mortgage insurance the PACE assessment will need to be included in the lender's underwriting and addressed in the processing, firm commitment issuance and closing. For MAP transactions, the lender will perform their required underwriting of the PACE documents, improvements and expenses, and include their conclusions in their underwriting summary to be forwarded to HUD as part of the application.
HUD Production staff will review the application under normal MAP processing and it is not anticipated that a review of the PACE assessment, improvements and corresponding obligations will unduly impact review or timeliness. It is not anticipated that any waivers will be required.
The FHA lender should include the owner's intent to enter into the PACE program, or current inclusion in the program for refinance transactions, in the Concept Meeting package. This will enable HUD staff to provide the Department's basic PACE requirements and underwriting considerations, as set forth in this memorandum, to the lender and owner.
The cost savings analysis derived from the Energy Audit, and the increase to the taxes, need to be supplied to the third party appraiser and contained in the FHA MAP application. A detailed description of the energy retrofit items, and the cost associated with each, needs to be supplied to the PCNA analyst and contained within the application.
The FHA lender will have reviewed the owner's request to enter into the PACE program, including plans and specifications (where applicable) that reflect the energy/water saving devices. The appraisal will take into account the energy saving measures, the expense associated with the assessment, and any impact of the energy savings on valuation as well as remaining economic life. The PCNA (where applicable) will provide a third party review and will reflect the projected needs; critical and non-critical repairs and reserve schedule; and the appropriateness of costs associated with energy/water saving devices. The lender should also review the acceptability of any repayment terms associated with the PACE assessment. It is recommended that the lender include a section in their underwriting summary specifically addressing the property's inclusion in the PACE program including the energy saving measures, costs, and their analysis.
FHA staff will then have the lender's summary and third party reviews reflecting the impact of the PACE program on the project underwriting. Staff should perform the standard underwriting review, focusing on highlights as discussed below. It is not anticipated that inclusion of the PACE program will require additional review time.
The Architectural and Engineering review should ensure that the building envelope (windows, doors, roofs, and walls) is addressed in any energy efficiency measures. All energy retro-fit items need to be included in the PCNA as non-critical repairs and need to be completed within one-year of endorsement. The PCNA will need to take into account the energy upgrades to accurately set the projected reserve for replacement schedule and amount, as well as set critical and non-critical repairs. Assuming the retro-fit timing is in-line with the non-critical repairs timing (i.e. within one-year of endorsement), the appraiser and the underwriter can forecast the applicable utility expense(s) based on the cost savings analysis while also taking into account the historic operations.
The Valuation review should include the additional taxes associated with the energy retro-fit as an expense line item on line 26 or 27 in Section E of the 92264 (i.e. this tax needs to be separated from the other taxes; such as, real estate). After the assessment repayment ends, the property will receive the benefit of decreased expenses. Ifthe market-at-large recognizes energy efficiency as a value driver, then this can and would be reflected in the capitalization rate. As usual, the capitalization rate selected needs to be supported and the primary support would be comparable sales. The selection of a lower capitalization rate should not be based on an increased NOI or a decreased expense ratio, rather should be based on the fact that the Project is energy efficient.
Any specific approvals related to PACE will be addressed in the Firm Commitment letter. The financing agreement can be executed at closing.
The Office of Multifamily Housing Programs seeks feedback regarding PACE and other alternative sources of capital that support energy and water efficiency. Please send any questions and comments to Bob Iber at Robert.G.Iber@hud.gov.
We run a courteous and professional service. Our experts take the requirements of our customers seriously.
At Eco Construction & Energy, we aim to provide our customers San Diego service that suits their requirements the best. All our products come with extended warranties to ensure they last a lifetime. Contact us for a free consultation.